in

andy vt's tools & blog

automating lazy

FLAC vs WMA Lossless

Last post Fri, Sep 24 2010 11:00 AM by babgvant. 1 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • Tue, Sep 21 2010 7:20 PM

    FLAC vs WMA Lossless

    Hi,

    I recently read a post on your Blog regarding benefit of FLAC.  I would like to confirm the article had 5.1 channel + recordings in mind and that for your typical CD Rip, (2 channel) WMA Lossless is as good as FLAC?  I use Media Centre through extender and can't play FLAC files. Just curious.

    Thanks

     

    Filed under:
  • Fri, Sep 24 2010 11:00 AM In reply to

    • babgvant
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Mon, Oct 2 2006
    • United Kingdom

    Re: FLAC vs WMA Lossless

    Lossless is lossess, the scheme shouldn't matter.  The only problem with using WMA is device support is somewhat limited.

Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
@2008 andy vt
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems