in

andy vt's tools & blog

Automating lazy

This Blog

Syndication

Tags

DVRMSToolbox

Blogroll

andy vt's blog

ToDvrms - 1.0.1.0 : Early Access Release

This is an Early Access release.

1.0.1.0
- force todvrms to run as x86
- explicitly load haali source for mkv
- explicitly load MPC-HC Mpeg source for ts, m2ts, and mpeg
- added c, path to edl or dtb xml file for commercial skipping (experimental; requires DSCutter filter included in DTB 1.2.1.8)
- change -w to 45 for wtv files since the SBEv2 allocates in 500MB chunks
- replace FakeTransform with AVC1toH264 (thanks Jere) filter for streaming H.264 into WTV (mkv supported with Haali source; ts,m2ts suppported with MPC-HC Mpeg source)
- add AAC as an allowed audio type

ToDVRMS includes two DirectShow filters, they must be registered by running registertodvrmsfilters.cmd prior to use.  After they are registered ToDVRMS can stream h.264/AC-3 files from mkv/m2ts into WTV files.  

bin | source

Published Aug 30 2009, 08:05 AM by babgvant
Filed under: ,

Comments

 

Twitted by techlifeweb said:

Pingback from  Twitted by techlifeweb

August 30, 2009 3:38 PM
 

brian said:

Using Windows 7 x64 RTM, I'm getting "No combination or intermediate filters can be found to make the connection".  I ran registertodvrmsfilters.cmd.

The command line is:

todvrms.exe "c:\test.mkv" "c:\test.dvr-ms" -t "Test MKV" -wtv

Any ideas?

August 30, 2009 6:17 PM
 

babgvant said:

Probably easier to start a thread with the full log.  I haven't tested on x64, but it should work.

Biggest thing to check is if x86 version of Haali installed

August 30, 2009 7:51 PM
 

diggityDawg said:

Should Haali x86 be installed, or should us x64 users be using Haali x64?  I've got the 64-bit version installed, but would be happy to switch back to x86 if that's a better solution...

August 31, 2009 1:58 PM
 

babgvant said:

All of the components need to be x86, including the Haali splitter.  

August 31, 2009 2:05 PM
 

donjjones said:

I left a msg in the forums about a bug I found with this.  Looks like it hasn't been approved yet for a couple days.  Is the forums the best place to go for posting issues with early access binaries?

Thanks much and kee up the good work!

September 3, 2009 4:44 PM
 

Two steps forward, one step back. But progress! « WAFtastic said:

Pingback from  Two steps forward, one step back.  But progress! « WAFtastic

September 4, 2009 2:52 PM
 

Ogre said:

The source link points to the previous version of the source. Is this because this is an Early Access release? Or just a mistake?

October 16, 2009 10:50 PM
 

babgvant said:

The source is correct, I just forgot to increment the build number in the project.

October 17, 2009 12:52 AM
 

babgvant said:

Since I was looking at the code, I figured another spin was in order.  Source and binary has been updated.

October 17, 2009 1:15 AM
 

Ogre said:

Hey cool thanks!

October 17, 2009 1:28 AM
@2008 andy vt
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems